Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> I didn't argue against s/strncpy/strlcpy/. That's clearly a sensible
> I am arguing about introducing additional code and error messages about
> it, that need to be translated. And starting doing so in isolationtester
> of all places.
I agree with Andres on this. Commit
7cb964acb794078ef033cbf2e3a0e7670c8992a9 is the very definition of
overkill, and I don't want to see us starting to plaster the source
code with things like this. Converting strncpy to strlcpy seems
appropriate --- and sufficient.
regards, tom lane
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: