On 11/15/2013 07:32 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 11/15/2013 04:00 PM, David Johnston wrote:
Looking at this a different way: could we just implement BSON and leave json

In short?  No.

For one thing, our storage format is different from theirs (better,
frankly), and as a result is not compliant with their "standard".

That's a reason why we won't use the name BSON, either, since it's a
trademark of 10gen.

What is more, it has restrictions which we do not wish to have. See for example its treatment of numerics.



Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to