On Nov 18, 2013, at 11:47 AM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Did you have hot_standby enabled on all of those machines? Even on the > 9.0.13 cluster? Actually, it's a bit more complex than this: 1. We don't know about P0, the 9.0.13 machine. I assume it was, but it was managed elsewhere. 2. P1 never had hot_standby = 'on', as it was never intended to be a hot stand_by. 3. S1 did have hot_standby = 'on. -- -- Christophe Pettus x...@thebuild.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
