On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
> <fabriziome...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The main goal of this patch is enable to an user the capability to store
> > options
> > (relations and attributes) related to extensions by using a fixed prefix
> > called 'ext' in
> > the defined name. It's cant be useful for replication solutions.
> > So, with this patch we can do that:
> > ALTER TABLE foo
> > SET (ext.somext.do_replicate=true);
> > When 'ext' is the fixed prefix, 'somext' is the extension name,
> > 'do_replicate' is the
> > extension option and 'true' is the value.
> This doesn't seem like a particular good choice of syntax;
What's your syntax suggestion?
> and I also have my doubts about the usefulness of the feature.
This feature can be used for replication solutions, but also can be used
for any extension that need do some specific configuration about tables,
attributes and/or indexes.
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
>> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello