2013/12/31 Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziome...@gmail.com> > > On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hello > > > > I am looking on this patch > > > > ALTER TABLE foo SET (ext.somext.do_replicate=true); > > > > Why is there fixed prefix "ext" ? > > > > This feature is similar to attaching setting to function > > > > CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION ... SET var = ...; > > > > We can use someprefix.someguc without problems there. > > > > Hi, > > We use the prefix "ext" (aka namespace) to distinguish these options which > are related to "extensions". > > Have you seen the previous thread [1] ? >
yes, but I don't understand why it is necessary? I use a analogy with custom GUC - and there we don't use similar prefix. Only any prefix is required - and it can contain a dot. Regards Pavel > > Regards, > > [1] > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFcNs+rqCq1H5eXW-cvdti6T-xo2STEkhjREx=odmakk5ti...@mail.gmail.com > > -- > Fabrízio de Royes Mello > Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL > >> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br > >> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com > >> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello > >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello >
