Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> writes: > Also, one of the places GCC warns about optimizing away an overflow > check (with -fno-wrapv) is inside the localtime.c file from the tz > library. I fixed it in my patch but in fact I checked and it's already > fixed upstream so I'm wondering whether you expect to merge in an > updated tz library? Is there anything surprising about the process or > do you just copy in the files? Would you be happy for someone else to > do it?
We've made a number of changes in our copies, unfortunately. What you have to do is look at the upstream diffs since we last synchronized with them (which according to src/timezone/README was tzcode 2010c) and merge those diffs as appropriate. It should be reasonably mechanical, but don't forget to update the README. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers