Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> writes:
> Also, one of the places GCC warns about optimizing away an overflow
> check (with -fno-wrapv) is inside the localtime.c file from the tz
> library. I fixed it in my patch but in fact I checked and it's already
> fixed upstream so I'm wondering whether you expect to merge in an
> updated tz library? Is there anything surprising about the process or
> do you just copy in the files? Would you be happy for someone else to
> do it?
Advertising
We've made a number of changes in our copies, unfortunately. What you
have to do is look at the upstream diffs since we last synchronized
with them (which according to src/timezone/README was tzcode 2010c)
and merge those diffs as appropriate. It should be reasonably
mechanical, but don't forget to update the README.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
