On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 08:44 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > > > On 3 December 2013 02:02, Dimitri Fontaine <dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote: > > > ISTM that the real solution to this particular problem is to decouple > > > the extensions that are currently in contrib from a specific postgres > > > version. > > > > "Problem"? It's not a bug that you get hstore 1.2 when you dump from 9.2 > > and reload into 9.3; that's a feature. You wanted an upgrade, presumably, > > I don't buy this argument at *all* and it's not going to fly when we've > got multiple versions of an extension available concurrently.
It seems there's a use case for both behaviors; perhaps we should include it in the control information? preserve_version_on_dump (boolean) FWIW, I find the current behavior surprising when in the mindset of a SQL extension. But it makes sense for things more closely tied to the backend. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers