On 12 December 2013 21:58, Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziome...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello > <fabriziome...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > On 12 December 2013 15:19, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> > >> > > Don't panic guys! I meant UTC offset only. And yes, it may not be >> > > needed, will check. >> > >> > Checked, all non-UTC TZ offsets work without further effort here. >> > >> >> Thanks! >> > > Reviewing the committed patch I noted that the "CheckForStandbyTrigger()" > after the delay was removed. > > If we promote the standby during the delay and don't check the trigger > immediately after the delay, then we will replay undesired WALs records. > > The attached patch add this check.
I removed it because it was after the pause. I'll replace it, but before the pause. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
