On 12 December 2013 10:42, KONDO Mitsumasa <kondo.mitsum...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> I agree with your request here, but I don't think negative values are >> the right way to implement that, at least it would not be very usable. > > I think that my proposal is the easiest and simplist way to solve this > problem. And I believe that the man who cannot calculate the difference in > time-zone doesn't set replication cluster across continents. > > >> My suggestion would be to add the TZ to the checkpoint record. This >> way all users of WAL can see the TZ of the master and act accordingly. >> I'll do a separate patch for that. > > It is something useful for also other situations. However, it might be > going to happen long and complicated discussions... I think that our hope is > to commit this patch in this commit-fest or next final commit-fest. Agreed on no delay for the delay patch, as shown by my commit. Still think we need better TZ handling. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
