On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Maciek Sakrejda <m.sakre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>VACUUM FREEZE sets both vacuum_freeze_min_age and vacuum_freeze_table_age to 
>0, but only the former is documented. This patch notes that the other setting 
>is also affected.
> (now with patch--sorry about that)

Your explanation and patch seems fine to me.
Kindly submit your patch in Open CommitFest

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to