On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: >> On 12/17/13, 8:16 PM, Maciek Sakrejda wrote: >>> (now with patch--sorry about that) >> >> This patch doesn't apply. > > There are some recent changes around same place which broke this > patch. Please find the modified patch attached with this mail, I had > changed order of specifying vacuum_freeze_min_age and > vacuum_freeze_table_age in Vacuum FREEZE option. > > I will mark this patch as Ready For Committer, unless there is > any other objection for this patch.
Committed with a grammatical correction. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers