On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Robert Haas escribió: >> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Alvaro Herrera >> <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >> > I assume without checking that passing reloid/ctid would allow this to >> > work for tuples in a RETURNING clause; and if we ever have an OLD >> > reference for the RETURNING clause of an UPDATE, that it would work >> > there, too, showing the post-update status of the updated tuple. >> >> I don't understand what you're saying here. Are you saying that >> reloid/ctid is a better approach, a worse approach, or just a >> different approach? > > That probably wasn't worded very well. I am just saying that whatever > approach we end up with, it would be nice that it worked somehow with > RETURNING clauses.
Hmm. It's not evident to me why that particular case would be any different than anything else, but that might be my ignorance showing. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
