On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 6:16 PM, David E. Wheeler <da...@justatheory.com> wrote: > * New operators: > + `hstore -> int`: Get string value at array index (starting at 0) > + `hstore ^> text`: Get numeric value for key > + `hstore ^> int`: Get numeric value at array index > + `hstore ?> text`: Get boolean value for key > + `hstore ?> int`: Get boolean value at array index > + `hstore #> text[]`: Get string value for key path > + `hstore #^> text[]`: Get numeric value for key path > + `hstore #?> text[]`: Get boolean value for key path > + `hstore %> text`: Get hstore value for key > + `hstore %> int`: Get hstore value at array index > + `hstore #%> text[]`: Get hstore value for key path > + `hstore ? int`: Does hstore contain array index > + `hstore #? text[]`: Does hstore contain key path > + `hstore - int`: Delete index from left operand > + `hstore #- text[]`: Delete key path from left operand
Although in some ways there's a certain elegance to this, it also sorta looks like punctuation soup. I can't help wondering whether we'd be better off sticking to function names. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
