On 1/9/14, 9:01 AM, Hannu Krosing wrote:
Yeah, and I think that the logging command that was suggested allows
>for that*if configured correctly*.
*But* for relying on this, we would also need to make logging
*synchronous*,
which would probably not go down well with many people, as it makes things
even more fragile from availability viewpoint (and slower as well).
Not really... you only care about monitoring performance when the standby has
gone AWOL *and* you haven't sent a notification yet. Once you've notified once
you're done.
So in this case the master won't go down unless you have a double fault:
standby goes down AND you can't get to your monitoring.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect j...@nasby.net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
