Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> writes: > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 9:14 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> In short then, I think we should just add this to EXPLAIN and be done. >> -1 for sticking the info into PlannedStmt or anything like that.
> I'm confused. I thought I was arguing to support your suggestion that > the initial planning store the time in the cached plan and explain > should output the time the original planning took. Uh, no, wasn't my suggestion. Doesn't that design imply measuring *every* planning cycle, explain or no? I was thinking more of just putting the timing calls into explain.c. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers