On 01/10/2014 01:34 PM, David Rowley wrote: > On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > >> All, >> >> To make this easier for everyone to participate in, I've created a wiki >> page: >> >> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/9.4CF4Triage >> >> Please add the patches you know well to the appropriate list, thanks! >> >> > I know my own patch pretty well and from my own point of view it's very > close to being about ready to go, but a good review may change that. Should > we be waiting for 2nd opinions or can patch authors decide for themselves? > Or were you talking only to commiters?
Advertising
Well, I'd prefer that someone other than the patch author assess the patch state; the author is going to be characteristically optimistic. However, it's a wiki. If you put it under "good to go" someone else who disagrees can move it. IMHO, if the patch hasn't had at least one review yet (in a prior CF), though, I'd put it under "Nearly Ready". -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
