While looking at pgpool-II user's complain, I see weired thing in the PostgreSQL log.
Jan 14 10:04:57 dayrhegrdp005 postgres[25223]: [4559-1] LOG: 00000: statement: PREPARE pgpool19528 AS SELECT count(*) from (SELECT has_function_privilege('measure', Jan 14 10:04:57 dayrhegrdp005 postgres[25223]: [4559-2] 'pgpool_regclass(cstring)', 'execute') WHERE EXISTS(SELECT * FROM pg_catalog.pg_proc AS p WHERE p.proname = 'pgpool_regclass')) Jan 14 10:04:57 dayrhegrdp005 postgres[25223]: [4559-3] AS s Jan 14 10:04:57 dayrhegrdp005 postgres[25223]: [4559-4] LOCATION: exec_parse_message, postgres.c:1159 Jan 14 10:04:57 dayrhegrdp005 postgres[25223]: [4560-1] LOG: 00000: statement: <BIND> pgpool19528 Jan 14 10:04:57 dayrhegrdp005 postgres[25223]: [4560-2] LOCATION: exec_bind_message, postgres.c:1460 Jan 14 10:04:57 dayrhegrdp005 postgres[25223]: [4561-1] ERROR: 34000: portal "pgpool19528" does not exist Jan 14 10:04:57 dayrhegrdp005 postgres[25223]: [4561-2] LOCATION: exec_execute_message, postgres.c:1669 The portal "portal19528" was created by a bind message (pgpool-II uses the identical name as the named statement) then subsequent exec_bind_message failed to find the portal. Could it ever happen? According to the user, PostgreSQL version is 8.1.23. Could it be a source of problem? Best regards, -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers