Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What would that converter need:
> [snip]
> I think that should be enough for converting table files. I'd like to
> experiment with something like this when I have some free time. Maybe
> next year...
It's difficult to say anything convincing on this topic without a
specific conversion requirement in mind.
Localized conversions like 7.3's tuple header change could be done on a
page-by-page basis as you suggest. (In fact, one reason I insisted on
putting in a page header version number was to leave the door open for
such a converter, if someone wants to do one.)
But one likely future format change for user data is combining parent
and child tables into a single physical table, per recent inheritance
thread. (I'm not yet convinced that that's feasible or desirable,
I'm just using it as an example of a possible conversion requirement.)
You can't very well do that page-by-page; it'd require a completely
different approach.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
