On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:06 AM, Jaime Casanova <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Jaime Casanova <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Andres Freund <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> * Maybe we should rename names like pause_at_recovery_target to >>> recovery_pause_at_target? Since we already force everyone to bother >>> changing their setup... >> >> i don't have a problem with this, anyone else? if no one speaks i will >> do what Andres suggests >> > > Actually Michael had objected to this idea but i forgot about that... > so i will wait for some consensus (my personal opinion is that > Michael's argument is a good one)
I prefer the current name. It's more like the way English is spoken. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
