On 11/29/2013 04:04 AM, Greg Stark wrote:
Attached is what I have so far. I have to say I'm starting to come
around to Tom's point of view. This is a lot of hassle for not much
gain. i've noticed a number of other overflow checks that the llvm
optimizer is not picking up on so even after this patch it's not clear
that all the signed overflow checks that depend on -fwrapv will be

This patch still isn't quite finished though.

In addition to what you have in the patch, Coverity is complaining about the overflow checks in int4abs (which is just like int8abs), and in DetermineTimeZoneOffset.

- Heikki

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to