Vik Fearing wrote: > On 01/20/2014 10:31 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > I think the idea was that patch authors should take responsibility for > > pushing their patches forward to 2014-01 if they still wanted them > > considered. Quite a few patches already were moved that way, IIRC. > > > > Agreed though that we shouldn't let them just rot. > > Does this mean I can resurrect my pg_sleep_until() patch? I didn't set > it back to Needs Review after I completely changed my approach based on > feedback. I would hate for it to get lost just because I didn't know > how to use the commitfest app. > > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1189
No objection here. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
