On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> With apologies to our beloved commitfest-mace-wielding CFM, commitfest
>> 2013-11 intentionally still contains a few open patches.  I think that
>> CF is largely being ignored by most people now that we have CF 2014-01
>> in progress.  If we don't want to do anything about these patches in the
>> immediate future, I propose we move them to CF 2014-01.
> I think the idea was that patch authors should take responsibility for
> pushing their patches forward to 2014-01 if they still wanted them
> considered.  Quite a few patches already were moved that way, IIRC.

Agreed on that general theory.

And, also, yeah, the shared memory message queueing stuff got
committed.  Sorry, I missed the fact that there was still an open CF
entry for that; I assumed that it would have been marked Returned with

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to