On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> Shouldn't we introduce a typedef LWLock* LWLockid; or something to avoid >> breaking external code using lwlocks? > > +1, in fact there's probably no reason to touch most *internal* code using > that type name either.
I thought about this but figured it was too much of a misnomer to refer to a pointer as an ID. But, if we're sure we want to go that route, I can go revise the patch along those lines. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
