Alvaro Herrera <> writes:
> Honestly, I would prefer that we push a patch that has been thoroughly
> reviewed and in which we have more confidence, so that we can push
> without a GUC.  This means mark in CF as needs-review, then some other
> developer reviews it and marks it as ready-for-committer.

FWIW, that was the point I was trying to make as well ;-)

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to