Hi, On 2014-02-26 07:32:45 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: > > * This definitely should include isolationtester tests actually > > performing concurrent ALTER TABLEs. All that's currently there is > > tests that the locklevel isn't too high, but not that it actually works. > > There is no concurrent behaviour here, hence no code that would be > exercised by concurrent tests.
Huh? There's most definitely new concurrent behaviour. Previously no other backends could have a relation open (and locked) while it got altered (which then sends out relcache invalidations). That's something that should be tested. > > * Why does ChangeOwner need AEL? > > Ownership affects privileges, which includes SELECTs, hence AEL. So? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers