On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 4:57 AM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> I'm looking at alternative options, because this is not terribly
>> helpful. With those big caveats in mind, consider the results of the
>> benchmark, which show the patch performing somewhat worse than the
>> master baseline at higher client counts:
> I think that's actually something else. I'd tried to make some
> definitions simpler, and that has, at least for the machine I have
> occasional access to, pessimized things. I can't always run the tests
> there, so I hadn't noticed before the repost.

I should have been clearer on one point: The pre-rebased patch (actual
patch series) [1] was applied on top of a commit from around the same
period, in order to work around the bit rot. However, I tested the
most recent revision from your git remote on the AWS instance.

Peter Geoghegan

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to