Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 2014-02-01 20:03:58 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> I think we should give serious consideration to desupporting this >> combination so that we can get rid of the plague of PGDLLIMPORT >> marks. Obviously this would depend on confirming that there are >> no more-interesting Windows build methods that require it --- but >> if there are any, I'd sure demand that there be an active buildfarm >> instance to keep us from breaking the case again in future.
> Weren't there more recent cases of needing to add PGDLLIMPORTs? Yeah, which makes the plot even thicker. If references to those variables failed, how did we not notice postgres_fdw's issue? I don't claim to know exactly what's going on, but I think we need to find out. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers