On 02/04/2014 10:53 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
"Joshua D. Drake" <j...@commandprompt.com> writes:
On 02/04/2014 09:34 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
My own opinion is that I've already wasted untold man-hours thanks to
the random porting problems induced by Windows, a platform that I never
have and never will care about personally.  I will *not* spend my own
time doing tests that someone else could do.  If we can't get some
effort contributed by someone who does use that platform, I'm personally
prepared to declare the entire damn thing no longer supported.


Although that is obviously your prerogative it is important to remember
that Windows is easily the second most used version of PostgreSQL out
there (behind Linux).

[ shrug... ]  If it's so widely used, why is it so hard to find somebody
who's willing to put in some development effort for it?

Well, from what I have seen of the Windows world there is a fairly sharp demarcation between users and developers. So use does not necessarily mean developer knowledge.



                        regards, tom lane




--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@gmail.com


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to