Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > On 02/01/2014 05:20 PM, Andres Freund wrote: >> Odd, most OBJS lines are kept in alphabetical order, but that doesn't >> seem to be the case here.
> This whole list is a mess, and we don't even have all the range_types > files following each other. > Worth cleaning up? +1. It's just neatnik-ism, but isn't compulsive neatnik-ism pretty much a job requirement for programmers? It's hard enough dealing with necessary complexities without having to wonder if some seemingly arbitrary choice has hidden meanings. > I'm actually wondering if it might be worth having some subgroups of > object files and then combining them into $OBJS. Nah, let's just alphabetize them and be done. The Makefile has no reason to care about subgroups of those files. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers