On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmonc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I still find the phrasing "as jsonb is more efficient for most
> purposes" to be a bit off  Basically, the text json type is faster for
> serialization/deserialization pattern (not just document preservation)
> and jsonb is preferred when storing json and doing repeated
>subdocument accesses.

Hm, I'm going to withdraw that.  I had done some testing of simple
deserialization (cast to text and the like) and noted that jsonb was
as much as 5x slower.  However, I just did some checking on
json[b]_populate_recordset though and it's pretty much a wash.


Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to