On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I think if it had been a clear, enforced goal all along, it might've been
> possible to build the system with such a restriction (for the most part at
> least). At this point though, the amount of work and code churn involved
> seems like it'd far exceed the benefits.
That makes sense to me. I certainly didn't think it was a slam-dunk that
what I was proposing would be an improvement. It just seemed like a
question worth asking. Thanks for your thoughts.