On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I think if it had been a clear, enforced goal all along, it might've been > possible to build the system with such a restriction (for the most part at > least). At this point though, the amount of work and code churn involved > seems like it'd far exceed the benefits. > > That makes sense to me. I certainly didn't think it was a slam-dunk that what I was proposing would be an improvement. It just seemed like a question worth asking. Thanks for your thoughts. - Christian
