Hello, I've marked this patch as 'Ready for committer'. > To be honest, I see no harm in changing the name as per your suggestion, > as it can improve segment naming for dynamic shared memory segments, > however there is no clear problem with current name as well, so I don't > want to change in places this patch has no relation.
Okay, let's go with it as it is. > I think best thing to do here is to put it as Notes To Committer, something > like: > Some suggestions for Committer to consider: > "Change the name of dsm segments from .. to .." > In general, what I see is that they consider all discussion in thread, but > putting some special notes like above will reduce the chance of getting > overlooked by them. I have done as a reviewer previously and it worked > well. Thank you for the sugestion. > > However, it is a bit different thing from this patch so > > I have no intention to compel to do the changing. > > Thanks to you for understanding my position. > > Thanks for reviewing the patch so carefully, especially Windows part > which I think was bit tricky for you to setup. It's my presure and I learned a lot. regards, -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers