* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> writes: > > Concerning the immediate fix for non-Windows systems, does any modern system > > ignore modes of Unix domain sockets? It appears to be a long-fixed problem: > > What I was envisioning was that we'd be relying on the permissions of the > containing directory to keep out bad guys. Permissions on the socket > itself might be sufficient, but what does it save us to assume that?
Agreed- the general approach to this, from what I've seen, is to handle
it with the directory.
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
