On 2014-03-03 20:32:13 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > Afair (I really haven't rechecked) all the actions that have a changed > > locklevels affect things that pg_dump recreates clientside, using a > > repeatable read snapshot, so there shouldn't be much change there? > > You're missing the point entirely if you think pg_dump recreates > everything client-side.
No, I am not obviously not thinking that. What I mean is that the things that actually change their locking requirement in the proposed patch primarily influence things that are reconstructed clientside by pg_dump. E.g ALTER TABLE ... CLUSTER ON, SET(...), ... Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers