* Atri Sharma (atri.j...@gmail.com) wrote: > If its not the case, the user should be more careful about when he is > scheduling backups to so that they dont conflict with DDL changes.
I'm not following this as closely as I'd like to, but I wanted to voice my opinion that this is just not acceptable as a general answer. There are a good many applications out there which do DDL as part of ongoing activity (part of ETL, or something else) and still need to be able to get a pg_dump done. It's not a design I'd recommend, but I don't think we get to just write it off either. Thanks, Stephen
Description: Digital signature