Claudio Freire <klaussfre...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Jim Nasby <j...@nasby.net> wrote:
>> Even better would be if the planner could estimate how bad a plan will
>> become if we made assumptions that turn out to be wrong.
> That's precisely what risk estimation was about.
Yeah. I would like to see the planner's cost estimates extended to
include some sort of uncertainty estimate, whereupon risk-averse people
could ask it to prefer low-uncertainty plans over high-uncertainty ones
(the plans we typically choose for ORDER BY ... LIMIT queries being great
examples of the latter). But it's a long way from wishing that to making
it so. Right now it's not even clear (to me anyway) how we'd measure or
model such uncertainty.
regards, tom lane
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: