Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > Very good point. I have modified the patch to add this block in all > cases where it was missing. I started to wonder about the comment and > if the Mingw fix was released. Based on some research, I see this as > fixed in mingw-runtime-3.2, released 2003-10-10. That's pretty old.
Yeah. I would vote for removing that code in all branches. There is no reason to suppose somebody is going to install 8.4.22 on a machine that they haven't updated mingw on since 2003. Or, if you prefer, just remove it in HEAD --- but going around and *adding* more copies seems like make-work. The fact that we've not heard complaints about the omissions is good evidence that nobody's using the buggy mingw versions anymore. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers