Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> Very good point. I have modified the patch to add this block in all
> cases where it was missing. I started to wonder about the comment and
> if the Mingw fix was released. Based on some research, I see this as
> fixed in mingw-runtime-3.2, released 2003-10-10. That's pretty old.
Yeah. I would vote for removing that code in all branches. There is no
reason to suppose somebody is going to install 8.4.22 on a machine that
they haven't updated mingw on since 2003. Or, if you prefer, just remove
it in HEAD --- but going around and *adding* more copies seems like
make-work. The fact that we've not heard complaints about the omissions
is good evidence that nobody's using the buggy mingw versions anymore.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
