Bruce Momjian <> writes:
> Very good point.  I have modified the patch to add this block in all
> cases where it was missing.  I started to wonder about the comment and
> if the Mingw fix was released.  Based on some research, I see this as
> fixed in mingw-runtime-3.2, released 2003-10-10.  That's pretty old. 

Yeah.  I would vote for removing that code in all branches.  There is no
reason to suppose somebody is going to install 8.4.22 on a machine that
they haven't updated mingw on since 2003.  Or, if you prefer, just remove
it in HEAD --- but going around and *adding* more copies seems like
make-work.  The fact that we've not heard complaints about the omissions
is good evidence that nobody's using the buggy mingw versions anymore.

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to