On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Tatsuo Ishii <is...@postgresql.org> wrote: > Maybe this is to demonstrating "peek ahead" does not consume changes, > but IMO this is a little bit confusing for readers and I think there's > a room to enhance the second sql session comment for example:
I didn't write that text, but yeah, that was my interpretation of why it was like that. > postgres=# -- Again you can also peek ahead in the change stream without > consuming changes I don't especially like that particular text, but perhaps it could be made more clear in some way. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
