On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Tatsuo Ishii <is...@postgresql.org> wrote:
> Maybe this is to demonstrating "peek ahead" does not consume changes,
> but IMO this is a little bit confusing for readers and I think there's
> a room to enhance the second sql session comment for example:

I didn't write that text, but yeah, that was my interpretation of why
it was like that.

> postgres=# -- Again you can also peek ahead in the change stream without 
> consuming changes

I don't especially like that particular text, but perhaps it could be
made more clear in some way.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to