Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote:
>> Given the minor symptoms in released versions, I lean against a back-patch.
> FWIW, I'd lean toward a back-patch. It's probably not a big deal
> either way, but I have a hard time seeing what risk we're avoiding by
> not back-patching, and it seems potentially confusing to leave
> known-wrong logic floating around in older branches.
I agree with Robert. This is a bug, let's fix it.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
