On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 06:59:05PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 21 March 2014 18:26, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Given the minor symptoms in released versions, I lean against a back-patch.
> > FWIW, I'd lean toward a back-patch. It's probably not a big deal
> > either way, but I have a hard time seeing what risk we're avoiding by
> > not back-patching, and it seems potentially confusing to leave
> > known-wrong logic floating around in older branches.
> Agreed. It could lead to some other bug by not fixing it.
Fair enough. I've back-patched it.
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: