From: "Amit Kapila" <amit.kapil...@gmail.com>
If you think that above scenario is not possible, then you just need to modify comment: "! * Remove old symlink in recovery...."
Hm, my scenario seems impossible. I reverted the comment.
One more minor point about patch:
+ struct stat st;
if (InRecovery)
{
struct stat st;
Defining stat struct two times in same function in different ways doesn't
seem to be good, we can do the same way for new usage as is already
done in code or may be declare it once.
OK, I removed the second (existing) definition of st. Regards MauMau
remove_tblspc_symlink_v6.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
