Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 03/26/2014 11:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> At least this one seems rather difficult to fix in this fashion:
>> 
>> output/create_function_1.source:83:ERROR:  could not find function 
>> "nosuchsymbol" in file "@libdir@/regress@DLSUFFIX@"
>> 
>> (I'm a bit inclined to think that we could dispense with @DLSUFFIX@
>> altogether; explicit use of the platform's library suffix has been
>> deprecated for at least a decade.  But the others are harder.)

> Well, maybe we should change dfmgr.c to stop outputting the DLSUFFIX in 
> its error message.

If it weren't in the input command, it wouldn't be in the message either,
I think.  It's the @libdir@ part of that that's problematic.

> But even if we find it too troublesome to get rid if the substitution 
> part altogether, I think minimizing the need for it would still be worth 
> doing. It would help extension authors, for example, who are most likely 
> to want to use it to load data files for testing their extensions.

Yeah, I suppose getting down to one file needing a replacement would still
be a significant improvement over the current situation.

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to