On 04/01/2014 01:07 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > What really bugs me about the example is that <> has a different > precedence from =, which seems more than odd. The example works just > fine if you use = instead of <>. But I guess it's been that way for a > very long time and there's not much to be done about it.
... and it would probably break umpty-zillion existing apps if we changed precedence. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
