On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As an utterly trivial point, I
> find the naming to be less than ideal: "poorman" is not a term I want
> to enshrine in our code.  That's not very descriptive of what the
> patch is actually doing even if you know what the idiom means, and
> people whose first language - many of whom do significant work on our
> code - may not.

I didn't come up with the idea, or the name.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to