On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: >> There are patches that are trivial enough >> that it's fine for someone to commit them without a public review >> first, but this isn't remotely close to being in that category. If >> nothing else, the fact that it extends the definition of the btree >> opclass is sufficient reason to merit a public review. > > hrmpf. You have a good point about that- I admit that I didn't consider > that as much as I should have.
Actually, contrary to the original subject of this thread, that isn't the case. I have not added a support function 3, which I ultimately concluded was a bad idea. This is all sort support. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
