On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Alternatively, we could do what the comments in pg_ctl have long thought >>> desirable, namely get rid of use of system() in favor of fork()/exec(). >>> With that, pg_ctl could do a setsid() inside the child process. > >> I like this last approach. > > Me too, but it looked like a less-than-trivial bit of work to me > (else I might just have gone and done it). Are you volunteering?
I don't have time right at the moment, but maybe at some point, if nobody else gets to it first. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
