On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Alternatively, we could do what the comments in pg_ctl have long thought
>>> desirable, namely get rid of use of system() in favor of fork()/exec().
>>> With that, pg_ctl could do a setsid() inside the child process.
>> I like this last approach.
> Me too, but it looked like a less-than-trivial bit of work to me
> (else I might just have gone and done it).  Are you volunteering?

I don't have time right at the moment, but maybe at some point, if
nobody else gets to it first.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to