* Magnus Hagander (mag...@hagander.net) wrote: > I didn't realize we had a guc for dynamic shared memory, must've missed > that in the discussion about that one. I agree that if we have that, it > makes perfect sense to have the same setting available for the main shared > memory segment.
I recall the back-and-forth about the issues with dynamic shared memory but I had hoped they would result in a solution that didn't involve having to support both.. Thanks, Stephen
Description: Digital signature