Jim, * Jim Nasby (j...@nasby.net) wrote: > On 4/22/14, 5:01 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > >We also have colo space and power, etc. So this would be the whole deal. > >The cluster would be up for as long as needed. > > > >Are the machine specs sufficient? Any other things we should look for? > > > >CC'd Tom on this email. > > Did anyone respond to this off-list?
Yes, I did follow-up with Tom. I'll do so again, as the discussion had died down. > Would these machines be more useful as dedicated performance test servers for > the community or generic BenchFarm members? I don't believe they would be terribly useful as buildfarm systems; we could set up similar systems with VMs to just run the regression tests. Where I see these systems being particularly valuable would be as the start of our performance farm, and perhaps one of the systems as a PG infrastructure server. Thanks! Stephen
Description: Digital signature