On 28/04/14 15:36, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Petr Jelinek <p...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
But if I do first receive after detach like in this sequence:
P1 -> set_sender
P1 -> attach
P2 -> set_receiver
P2 -> attach
P1 -> send
P1 -> send
P1 -> detach
P2 -> receive
I get SHM_MQ_DETACHED on the receiver even though there are messages in the
ring buffer.
That's a bug.
I'm thinking that the problem is really revolves around
shm_mq_wait_internal(). It returns true if the queue is attached but
not detached, and false if either the detach has already happened, or
if we establish via the background worker handle that it will never
come. But in the case of receiving, we want to treat
attached-then-detached as a success case, not a failure case.
Can you see if the attached patch fixes it?
Yes, the patch fixes it for me.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
