On 2014-05-03 00:13:45 -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Friday, May 2, 2014, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > I've been working with an app that uses a schema name whose spelling is
> > hard to type, and the lack of tab completion for "SET search_path TO" was
> > bugging me.  So see attached.
> >
> > I filter out the system schemata, but not public.

That'd be nice.

> diff --git a/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c b/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 6d26ffc..dec3d4a
> *** a/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c
> --- b/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c
> *************** psql_completion(const char *text, int st
> *** 3230,3235 ****
> --- 3230,3242 ----
>   
>                       COMPLETE_WITH_LIST(my_list);
>               }
> +             else if (pg_strcasecmp(prev2_wd, "search_path") == 0)
> +             {
> +                     COMPLETE_WITH_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_schemas
> +                                                             " AND nspname 
> not like 'pg\\_%%' "
> +                                                             " AND nspname 
> not like 'information_schema' "
> +                                                             " UNION SELECT 
> 'DEFAULT' ");
> +             }

Why should we exclude system schemata? That seems more likely to be
confusing than helpful? I can see a point in excluding another backend's
temp tables, but otherwise?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- 
 Andres Freund                     http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to